Ginwright And Cammarota

 In your own words, describe Ginwright + Cammarota’s critique of Positive Youth Development. Do you agree? Why or why not?

They both believe that youth development is necessary but according  to them positive youth development is limited because the strategy used by positive youth development to promote youth assets is risking serious impact in social, economic and political influences in the lives of urban youth. They also believe that Positive youth development is based on white middle-class concept of youth.

Yes I agree with Ginwright and Cammarota´s critique because I think Youth should be enforced to look more in social aspect of life because it influences them the most specially if they are minorities. Gaining more knowledge about social Justice is a form of freedom because you become more in control.


How is Social Justice YDEV different?

social justice if different because it gives us the opportunity to look beyond the problem and asset assumptions about youth behavior. it gives us Youth workers the opportunity to examine and teach them to critically think of what´s in their surrounding.  This will help them navigate in the world with more knowledge about social, political and economic freedom.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Stereotypes about youth.

Youth-Led efforts

Care In Education